Subject: Re: [boost] [review][beast] Review of Beast starts today : July 1 - July 10
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-03 13:48:46
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Peter Koch Larsen via Boost
> My guess is that - as Niall pointed out
> - there is a large group of developers that could benefit from the
> parsing part alone,
They can use the parsing part alone today as well as the serializing
part, with a dependence on <boost/asio/buffer.hpp>. Examples of this
usage are in the documentation.
I believe the dependency on <boost/asio/buffer.hpp> is the main point
of contention (Niall, confirm?). I would like to have this discussion
if possible since a resolution would satisfy everyone.
>and probably also a group that would perform their own parsing and just use the transfer part.
This I have not heard of before, and is not a supported use-case. I
don't think its particularly interesting to users.
> Beast should be split into two libraries.
Beast is proposed as-is.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk