Re: [boost] [build] header-only lib need dir 'build'?

Subject: Re: [boost] [build] header-only lib need dir 'build'?
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-05 11:38:36

2017-07-05 13:22 GMT+02:00 Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>:

> Oliver Kowalke wrote:
>
> Hi,
>> does a header-only library require sub-directory 'build' (especially if
>> the lib depends on another, non-header-only library)?
>>
>
> No, it doesn't; it just confuses the top-level build that the library
> requires building.
>

OK, thx