Subject: Re: [boost] Encoding address-model in library names
From: Michael Caisse (mcaisse-lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-05 22:02:03
On 7/5/17 15:43, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
>> Furthermore, my answer to the last question depends on whether this is
>> an optional feature or a compulsory change. In case of the latter, I'm
>> against the change.
> Special-casing Boost.Python to not support this feature would be a
> hassle and a bit hostile to its users, relegating them to a second
> class, but it's doable.
Having a library that works differently for naming than all the rest
seems like a non-starter to me.
If the community decides the change is good then it should be for all
-- Michael Caisse Ciere Consulting ciere.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk