Subject: Re: [boost] Encoding address-model in library names
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-06 23:03:17
On 07/07/17 01:56, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> There's little difference from the implementation point (I think)...
> Not quite true because <address-model> is already supported by the
> relevant Boost.Build rule, which is why the patch is so trivial, while
> the architecture isn't. But I'll see what I can do.
Thank you, Peter.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk