Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11

Subject: Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-15 13:09:56

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Why not separate the two use case into two primitives? We usually want one
> or the other and different tools would make sense, at least for documenting
> purpose.

Now that its been explained, I appreciate that `mp_if_c` has
additional functionality. I think its a mistake to split it up when it
is so elegantly expressed in its current form. I just wish there was
more explanation in the reference for a novice such as myself.

Thanks