Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11

Subject: Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11
From: Joaquin M López Muñoz (joaquinlopezmunoz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-17 11:22:24

El 17/07/2017 a las 11:54, Peter Dimov via Boost escribió:
> Joaquin M López Muñoz wrote:
>
>> You can replace your implementation with using std::make_from_tuple 
>> when the latter is available.
>
> You can still replace construct_from_tuple, you're just not forced to 
> because the code doesn't break. 

Not totally sure I got my point across: I mean, if you decided to rename 
construct_from_tuple as
make_from_tuple, your internal lib code can detect whether 
std::make_from_tuple exists and,
in this case, replace boost:mp11::make_from_tuple definition with a 
using std::make_from_tuple
declaration:

namespace boost{ namespace mp11{

#ifndef __cpp_lib_make_from_tuple
template<class T, class Tp> T make_from_tuple(Tp&& tp){...}
#else
using std::make_from_tuple;
#endif

}}

No ambiguities would then arise.

Joaquín M López Muñoz