Subject: Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-17 15:20:10
Fletcher, John P wrote:
> In my initial work using MP11 I found that the examples given in the
> documentation contained some features which are not C++11 but instead
> C++14 or later. As I am wanting to adapt code from C++03 it is not
> helpful to have things which do not compile with C++11 only.
I went over these at one point and tried to either remove the C++14-isms, or
mention their use and provide a C++11 alternative.