Subject: Re: [boost] Dependency report
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-17 17:46:25
On 07/17/17 16:29, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> One obvious low-hanging fruit here is moving <boost/next_prior.hpp> from
> utility to iterator, breaking the utility -> iterator edge; I think this
> was discussed recently?
I don't think it was (or may be I missed it).
Strictly speaking, boost::next/prior is not tied to iterators; it is
compatible with any type that has the necessary operators (e.g.
integers). Although the use case with iterators is probably the most
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk