Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-19 16:09:13

Next message: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] CMake Announcement from Boost Steering Committee"
Previous message: Klemens Morgenstern: "Re: [boost] CMake Announcement from Boost Steering Committee"
In reply to: Fletcher, John P: "Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11"
Next in thread: Brook Milligan: "Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11"

Fletcher, John P wrote:

> Here is my review of MP11.
>
> 1. Should Mp11 be accepted into Boost? Please state all conditions for
> acceptance explicity.
> Yes I think it should be accepted. There are changes I would like to see
> to the documentation. I don’t regard those as setting a condition on
> acceptance.

Thank you John.

Next message: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] CMake Announcement from Boost Steering Committee"
Previous message: Klemens Morgenstern: "Re: [boost] CMake Announcement from Boost Steering Committee"
In reply to: Fletcher, John P: "Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11"
Next in thread: Brook Milligan: "Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk