Subject: Re: [boost] [review][beast] Beast Review Results
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-20 15:05:19
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Mike Gresens via Boost
> There must be a reason why my formal review was sorted out.
> Obviously my formal review was not good enough.
To my knowledge there is no such thing as a "rejected" review - ALL
reviews are considered and weighed appropriately. I think we might
have just forgotten to include you in the list, my apologies! I double
checked my own list and you aren't on their although obviously I read
your review (I read every message posted to the list, its nice to see
you in the math/polynomial thread :) ).
Your review was quite helpful, it gave me insight into how Beast is
being used and how it might be improved so I would say do not be
disheartened because of a clerical error - your input was quite
valuable and I also think that the regulars on the list are quite
happy to see new people participating!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk