Re: [boost] Are there libraries without ACTIVE maintainers?

Subject: Re: [boost] Are there libraries without ACTIVE maintainers?
From: paul (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-20 15:42:18

On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 20:17 -0600, Gary Furnish via Boost wrote:
> I've tried without success to get attn of property tree maintainers.  I
> think it is unmaintained.

It definitely is unmaintaned. It has PRs from over a year without any response
from the maintainer. It also doesn't allow opening issues either. I don't see
how a open source library can be maintained without allowing users to open bug
reports.

> 
> On Jul 19, 2017 7:50 PM, "Michael Caisse via Boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > <please do not top post>
> > 
> > On 7/19/17 15:58, Alexander Zaitsev via Boost wrote:
> > > 
> > > Yes, i know about this program. But what about libraries which have not
> > > any company-maintainer?
> > > 
> > > 
> > The link provided also refers to the CMT (Community Maintenance Team).
> > More details are here:
> > <https://svn.boost.org/trac10/wiki/CommunityMaintenance>
> > 
> > --
> > Michael Caisse
> > Ciere Consulting
> > ciere.com
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/
> > mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boo
> st