Re: [boost] Are there libraries without ACTIVE maintainers?

Subject: Re: [boost] Are there libraries without ACTIVE maintainers?
From: Jeff Trull (edaskel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-22 18:04:05

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Alexander Zaitsev via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hello.
>
> I think it's very important question: are there libraries without ACTIVE
> maintainers?
>
For what? Because without active maintainers we can't guarantee quality of
> the libraries.
>

This is a question of interest to me as well.  Are there any minimum
standards for responsiveness to PRs and bug reports?  Can we quantify what
"unmaintained" means?