Subject: Re: [boost] cmake target and binary name mangling
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-24 12:20:54
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Niall Douglas via Boost
>>> So everything you just said is all irrelevant. Meanwhile, there
>>> are *enormous* end user gains to mangling the binary name.
>> Then why does no linux distro do this? Even when they support
>> compiling for multiple platforms. I think the standard way is to use
>> separate directories instead of using encoded name, which is very
>> much relevant and current practice.
> Different audiences.
> Note I have little problem with the boost release zip of precompiled
> binaries not having mangled names, though I still think it
How'd you handle Debug vs Release mode on Windows?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk