Subject: Re: [boost] cmake target and binary name mangling
From: Daniela Engert (dani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-24 12:46:11
Am 24.07.2017 um 14:28 schrieb Niall Douglas via Boost:
> On 24/07/2017 13:20, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Niall Douglas via Boost
>> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>> So everything you just said is all irrelevant. Meanwhile, there
>>>>> are *enormous* end user gains to mangling the binary name.
Very much true!
> As I mentioned, me personally I'd ship the name mangled versions always.
> I've found it leads to less surprise.
Well, my teammates love it not having to second-guess the supported
target configuration of a precompiled binary.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk