Subject: Re: [boost] Switch to CMake -- Analysis
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-24 15:52:43
On 07/24/2017 08:08 AM, Tim Blechmann via Boost wrote:
> otoh, fast compile times are not necessarily the only requirement:
> parallel builds with ninja render windows unresponsive, so it are much
> more suited for buildservers (macos is better, linux doesn't have this
> issues). so as developer your productivity may be lower, even if the
> compile times are faster.
If you want to do other things while the build is
running, then you should set the number of parallel
jobs to something less than the number of cores,
to leave some cycles free.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk