Subject: Re: [boost] cmake target and binary name mangling
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-25 22:16:19
Niall Douglas wrote:
> > The implication is that when a library changes from header-only to
> > static/shared, all dependent libraries need to change themselves to
> > static/shared too.
> I'm not sure if this is a question or a statement. But in either case, yes
> it does.
My point was that under my overcomplicated scheme, this doesn't happen. Your
dependency may change from header-only to static/shared, or from
static/shared to header-only, and you don't need to do anything.
And when I say "change" here, I mean that version 1 was header-only, version
2 becomes static/shared, version 3 becomes header-only again, and dependents
don't need to make corresponding changes each time this occurs.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk