Subject: Re: [boost] Boost tests with cmake
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-29 09:02:53
Louis Dionne wrote:
> If we go Paul's way (which is IMHO the right way in the long term), ...
I've given it some thought and I like the BCM approach; BCM should be a
library in libs/bcm (if we retain the name).
But I think that Paul's insistence to support the cget workflow, for which
nobody at the moment cares but him, is making things more complicated and
error-prone than they could be. (The cget workflow is the ability to build
and install Boost libraries one by one, independently of one another,
without a superproject; this requires them to refer to one another with
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk