Subject: Re: [boost] Dependency report
From: Raffi Enficiaud (raffi.enficiaud_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-30 21:12:56
Le 30.07.17 à 19:24, Peter Dimov via Boost a écrit :
> Raffi Enficiaud wrote:
>> However, still bimap refers to test as a "secondary dependency". What
>> does that mean?
> bimap depends on property_map:
> which depends on mpi:
> which depends on graph:
> which depends on test:
Thanks, but to go back to my question, "secondary dependency" means the
union of all sources in the dependency graph, is that correct?
Nice tool BTW (although seeing mpi<-property_map and test<-graph is a
bit scary I have to say).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk