Re: [boost] Dependency report

Subject: Re: [boost] Dependency report
From: Raffi Enficiaud (raffi.enficiaud_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-30 21:12:56

Le 30.07.17 à 19:24, Peter Dimov via Boost a écrit :
> Raffi Enficiaud wrote:
>
>> However, still bimap refers to test as a "secondary dependency". What
>> does that mean?
>
> bimap depends on property_map:
>
> https://pdimov.github.io/boostdep-report/develop/bimap.html#property_map
>
> which depends on mpi:
>
> https://pdimov.github.io/boostdep-report/develop/property_map.html#mpi
>
> which depends on graph:
>
> https://pdimov.github.io/boostdep-report/develop/mpi.html#graph
>
> which depends on test:
>
> https://pdimov.github.io/boostdep-report/develop/graph.html#test

Thanks, but to go back to my question, "secondary dependency" means the 
union of all sources in the dependency graph, is that correct?

Nice tool BTW (although seeing mpi<-property_map and test<-graph is a 
bit scary I have to say).

Raffi