Subject: Re: [boost] CMake and Boost Build tests
From: Roland Bock (rbock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-31 09:21:52
On 2017-07-27 17:08, Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:
>> No I don't go to CPPCon but if you can get programmers to create
>> better documentation by your talk there I am all for it.
> I'm sort of pessimistic:
> a) I don't think that most developers think there is a problem. That is
> that the documentation they create is just fine.
> b) If there is a problem, it's that the users aren't smart enough
> c) Hence, I think that most developers will read the abstract and
> conclude that the subject is trivial and doesn't hold any value for them.
For what it's worth:
- I know that my documentation is incomplete
- I am amazed by what users figure out
- I just read your abstract. I won't promise to be in the room (there
is just too much going on at CppCon), but it sounds valuable to me.
I sincerely hope that you touch on expression templates, too. Seems to
me I need concepts and metaclasses to describe them.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk