Subject: Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Review report
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-03 07:49:07
Le 02/08/2017 Ã 13:22, Bjorn Reese via Boost a Ã©crit :
> I. VERDICT
> Mp11 is accepted unconditionally into Boost.
I don't share the argument that mp_ prefix is better for
standardization. Who knows what the committee will design/decide?
I believe namespaces are the "reason d'Ãªtre" to avoid such prefixes.
Anyway, the review is finished.
Thanks Peter, R. Bjorn and all the reviewers for making/helping it
possible to have a modern meta-programming library in Boost.
Hopping to see it in the next Boost release,
P.S. I was on vacations during the review :(
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk