Subject: Re: [boost] boost_check_library.py: correct handling of header-only libs?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-10 01:01:30
On 08/09/2017 06:34 PM, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
> This script fails for me:
> Because there is no libs/beast/build.
It exists, but does not contain a Jamfile.
> But Beast is header-only and has
> no src/ directory, is this correct?
A header-only library should not have a build/
directory at all.
> Apologies for posting to the list, but there is no Issues tab on the
> boostorg/boost repo.