Subject: Re: [boost] Switch to CMake -- Analysis
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-12 06:02:43
Am 11.08.2017 10:04 nachm. schrieb "Robert Ramey via Boost" <
On 7/21/17 7:21 AM, Thomas Heller via Boost wrote:
> Compare the lengthy and exhausting review process you have to go through
> with the click of a few buttons and hammering something onto a keyboard.
> And no, Robert, while the incubator was a nice idea, it doesn't
> compensate that either;)
Hmm - in looking through the CMake stuff I just came upon this. I'm
curious as what it means? The boost library incubator was conceived to
support and strengthen the boost review process - not supplant it.
I'm saying that even with the incubator, it does not match the ease of just
publishing on github and announce your stuff on various channels.
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk