Re: [boost] Switch to CMake -- Analysis

Subject: Re: [boost] Switch to CMake -- Analysis
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-12 06:02:43

Am 11.08.2017 10:04 nachm. schrieb "Robert Ramey via Boost" <
boost_at_[hidden]>:

On 7/21/17 7:21 AM, Thomas Heller via Boost wrote:

> Compare the lengthy and exhausting review process you have to go through
> with the click of a few buttons and hammering something onto a keyboard.
> And no, Robert, while the incubator was a nice idea, it doesn't
> compensate that either;)
>

Hmm - in looking through the CMake stuff I just came upon this.  I'm
curious as what it means?  The boost library incubator was conceived to
support and strengthen the boost review process - not supplant it.

I'm saying that even with the incubator, it does not match the ease of just
publishing on github and announce your stuff on various channels.

Robert Ramey

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman
/listinfo.cgi/boost