Subject: Re: [boost] [Root.Ptr] Update (C consultancy -> ISO)
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-14 15:42:02
On 08/14/17 16:46, Phil Bouchard via Boost wrote:
> It was just a quick way to protect the parser during the weekend but I'll
> fix this tonight.
> Alexander Zaitsev via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Why you cannot create your own fork and make it private for your stuff?
> I don't understand.
> 14.08.2017 15:04, Phil Bouchard via Boost Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐµÑ:
>> On 08/14/2017 02:48 AM, Olaf van der Spek via Boost wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Phil Bouchard via Boost
>>> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> I just wanted to update everyone that I just made the Root.Ptr
>>>> This is because I am about to work as a consultant to fix memory
>>>> leaks in C
>>>> code and possibly C++98 code later on. When I am done testing
>>>> Root.Ptr then
>>>> I will submit it to ISO which is already pre-approved.
>>> Why does the repo need to be private while you work on other stuff?
>> The latest branch includes an entire new C / C++98 parser which I will
>> use for my work. Unfortunately we cannot make a single branch private
>> and we need to take the whole repository down.
>> Once I am done then I'll make everything public again or if I create a
>> new private repository for the parser then I can make root_ptr public.
>> I'll let you know but the parser will remain commercial.
Phil, Alexander, please, don't top post.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk