Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: impl_ptr (pimpl)
From: Seth (bugs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-15 11:57:27
On 15-08-17 02:51, Vladimir Batov via Boost wrote:
> That might happen to be a deal breaker but that's the best I could
> come up with to get it to work. If anyone has a better working
> solution, I am all ears.
I have the same interest. I'd love to know what the global declaration
is "helping" work. I have the intuition that it is not necessary in any
way if you properly account for ADL.
Can you point at an explanation of _what purpose_ is served, how, by
having ::impl_ptr in the global namespace? I'm happy to toy with it and
possibly create a PR.
In the light of that, it would help if there were tests.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk