Re: [boost] Improving Boost Docs

Subject: Re: [boost] Improving Boost Docs
From: Soul Studios (matt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-16 01:48:47

On 16/08/2017 1:13 p.m., Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Soul Studios via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> My main beef with Doxygen is reduced code-readability, which I think has
>> been mentioned a number of times on this list by various others-
> 
> Yep, and every time someone brings this up I provide this
> counter-example of Doxygen-assisted output:
> 

Not sure how that is meant to counter the claim of reduced code 
readability. It merely seems to demonstrate that Doxygen can be used to 
generate documentation- which seems obvious.