|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Broken unary_functions in numeric conversions
From: Gary Furnish (gfurnish_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-22 14:35:51
Actually this isn't true at all: develop gets
In file included from
../../../../boost/numeric/conversion/detail/numeric_cast_traits.hpp:12:0,
from
../../../../boost/numeric/conversion/numeric_cast_traits.hpp:28,
from ../../../../boost/numeric/conversion/cast.hpp:34,
from compile_fail/built_in_numeric_cast_traits.cpp:11:
../../../../boost/numeric/conversion/detail/preprocessed/numeric_cast_traits_common.hpp:987:12:
error: previous definition of âstruct
boost::numeric::numeric_cast_traits<unsigned int, float>â
struct numeric_cast_traits
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<
~
unsigned int
~~~~~~~~~~~~
, float
~~~~~~~
>
~
compile_fail/built_in_numeric_cast_traits.cpp:24:8: error:
redefinition of âstruct boost::numeric::numeric_cast_traits<long int,
float>â
struct numeric_cast_traits< \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM( BOOST_PP_TUPLE_ELEM(4,0,state) \
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
, BOOST_PP_TUPLE_ELEM(4,3,state) ) \
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
, BOOST_PP_TUPLE_ELEM(4,2,state)>
and a bunch more spam.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Gary Furnish <gfurnish_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Is there a problem with just merging dev? That seems to work...
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Brandon Kohn via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 8/20/2017 17:05 PM, Gary Furnish via Boost wrote:
>>>
>>> SHA-1: 2009f0d4fc49a6db59b950a3140f8d1f58e1a8c6
>>
>> Can we get someone to actually recommit a fix?
>>
>> I'm working on this now. Sorry for the delay in responding.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Brandon
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk