Subject: Re: [boost] [1.65.0] Point release?
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-26 18:16:51
On 26 August 2017 at 18:02, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Daniel James wrote:
>> We could use a more complicated branching scheme to merge the changes back
>> into the main branches.
> My old suggestion was (still is) that we could use a dedicated 'release'
> superproject branch for the releases, avoiding the need to freeze master.
I was talking about the submodule branches. Branching the super
project wouldn't gain much nowadays, as little is done directly in it.
> But we don't rely that much on the testers nowadays, so this would be less
> of an issue.
I do. The turnaround on Travis is pretty terrible at the moment, and
that's going to get worse as more modules use it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk