Re: [boost] [iterator] What documentation is actual?

Subject: Re: [boost] [iterator] What documentation is actual?
From: Michel Morin (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-27 11:42:24

Edward Diener wrote:
> Still the entire process is very GNU and Linux oriented.
> Maybe it can be done under cygwin or mingw(-64), but most probably needs a
> Linux OS.

I think continuing to use rst docs makes an unnecessary burden to maintainers.
Migration into quickbook docs might result in different look and feel in the
generated HTMLs, but making the docs maintainable is much more important.

Regards,
Michel