Subject: Re: [boost] [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-04 16:50:35
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost wrote:
> Hi All,
> I was about to announce the start of the Boost.Double_ended review, running
> from today to 17th of September. This is what we agreed upon with John
> Now, when I look at http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html it
> seems that there is also a review of the Fit library scheduled, greatly
> overlapping with Boost.Double_ended.
> Do we run two reviews simultaneously, or what?
A review date for Double_Ended was never published on the schedule.
The last state on that library on the review schedule was:
Submitter: Benedek Thaler
Review Manager: Needed
Review Dates: -
This was before all unscheduled reviews were purged from the schedule.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk