Subject: Re: [boost] Why is the boost documentation so bad?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-08 08:33:01
On 09/08/17 06:04, Florian Lindner via Boost wrote:
> Am 08.09.2017 um 10:51 schrieb Vinnie Falco via Boost:
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Florian Lindner via Boost
>> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> why is the documentation so bad?
>> I think it is unfair to say that every library has bad documentation.
> You're right of course. This is just an impression I got from the libraries I worked with so far, which logging, test,
> ptr_container and some others.
I'm wondering what are your complaints about Boost.Log docs and how do
you think it could be improved.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk