Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] C++17 detection
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-14 04:24:39


On 9/13/17 6:17 PM, Glen Fernandes via Boost wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
>> On 9/10/17 11:43 AM, Barrett Adair via Boost wrote:
>>
>>> I like to configure on a per-feature basis, so I use these when boost
>>> Boost.Config falls short:
>>> http://en.cppreference.com/w/User:D41D8CD98F/feature_testing_macros
>>
>>
>> Looks like the best answer so far
>>
>
> Boost.Config actually uses the feature testing macros when available
> and when applicable (in combination with other things, i.e. an
> understanding of what the C++ implementation in question actually is
> known to support, regardless of what it advertises). Using the feature
> testing macros alone may not be what you want.

I'd be happy to used Boost.Config - that's where I looked first. But I
don't see what I need in there.

>
> Glen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk