Subject: Re: [boost] [review] The review of Boost.DoubleEnded starts today: September 21 - September 30
From: Hans Dembinski (hans.dembinski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-26 16:09:50
> On 26. Sep 2017, at 03:39, Zach Laine via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden] <mailto:boost_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>> For devector:
>> Is it it not obvious that an O(1) push_front performs better than an O(n)
>> vec.insert( vec.begin(), x ) ?
> I find the use of the word "obvious" when applied to optimization to be a
> little suspect.
I wanted to say the same. I got my fair share of surprises when I benchmarked code that I expected to run faster than some other code. I can recommend Google Benchmark for micro-benchmarks, it is quite neat.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk