Subject: Re: [boost] [review] The review of Boost.DoubleEnded starts today: September 21 - September 30
From: Soul Studios (matt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-27 05:12:21
>> In this connection,
>> may be relevant. It argues for a 1.5 growth factor.
That has pretty much been refuted by third party testing as far as I'm
aware. In my personal experience I found no performance difference
between fbvector and libstc++'s.
> Actually, no need to look at something like FBVector, the VS2017 STL
> std::vector implementation uses the following growth policy:
> capacity += capacity / 2;
> I'm not sure how that used to be, on the MSDN blog (not that long ago) it
> was noted that an overhaul of std::vector was implemented. I think I
> remember it used to duplicate before (but cannot verify that anymore).
It used to be closer to 1.5 - I'm glad they changed it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk