Subject: Re: [boost] [review] The review of Boost.DoubleEnded starts today: September 21 - September 30
From: Thorsten Ottosen (tottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-28 08:49:26
Den 27-09-2017 kl. 23:06 skrev Ion GaztaÃ±aga via Boost:
> On 26/09/2017 22:03, Joaquin M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz via Boost wrote:
>> 4. Same goes for the growing policy. Not even boost::container::vector
>> features a growing
>> policy, which seems an indication that this is not a heavily demanded
>> customization point.
> True. But is on my todo list I was recently trying to add customization
> options to Boost.Container containers (I need to offer something
> different to my fans that the standard containers can't offer ;-).
We do need some general agreement about what a boost library can do and
not do. There is a large difference between saying "I'm not going to use
this" or "I don't see the benefit" and saying "I want to prohibit
legitimate use cases for other people".
> Usually the choice is usually between a factor of 2 and 1.5. The
> theoretical limit value for the growth factor to be able to reuse
> previously allocated memory is roughly 1.61. Howard Hinnant shared with
> my a nice paper about this more than ten years ago showing how to grow
> using a factor of 1.6 and the math behind this. I just reviewed that
> brief paper recently, and since it's not longer online, Howard kindly
> has given me permission to share it with the Boost community.
Thanks for sharing this.
There is another argument for 1.5 and that is that the casual users ends
up with only about 16% wasted space on average compared to 25%.
Reading through the argument, there are a few things I don't get.
Is seems that the proof sort of assumes one container instance. And will
the heap manager actually coalesce anything?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk