Subject: Re: [boost] [review] The review of Boost.DoubleEnded starts today: September 21 - September 30
From: Thorsten Ottosen (tottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-28 17:14:09
Den 27-09-2017 kl. 21:39 skrev Tim Song via Boost:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Anyway, my main point, which I perhaps didn't express too well, is
> that "introduce unsafe functions to save a branch" and "have no way to
> avoid expensive copies if the move constructor can potentially throw"
> are inconsistent.
That's true. We should do both.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk