Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Uuid and header-only support
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-04 17:53:35
James E. King, III wrote:
> Making Boost.Random header-only could still be considered an improvement,
> whether or not what it depends on is header-only.
It might, but Uuid will still regress from header-only to requiring a
library, so this doesn't help.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk