Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Uuid and header-only support
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-06 12:49:03
> Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> > I have been following this erudite discussion with interest, but
> > ignorance.
> > Without wishing to add even more entropy, may I suggest that adding more
> > options is rarely a bad thing, but it creates an even more bewildering
> > set of options for the user (for UUID, I fear as ignorant as I).
> That is why I'd like the default generator to do the right thing and doing
> the wrong thing to be harder and not be presented as an equivalent...
... or more "optimal"...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk