Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Uuid and header-only support
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-08 01:45:21
Steven Watanabe wrote:
> On 11/06/2017 06:17 AM, James E. King, III via Boost wrote:
> > Is there an existing PRNG in Boost.Random that would be better than
> > mersenne to use in a "bulk" uuid generator typedef?
> Boost.Random does not have any cryptographic prngs (apart from
I came across
in the course of reading
ChaCha20 looks like a reasonable candidate for Boost.Random, and the license
of Orson Peters's implementation seems Boost-compatible.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk