Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?

Subject: Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?
From: Daniel Frey (d.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-13 16:46:40

> On 13. Nov 2017, at 17:26, Daniel Frey via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>> On 13. Nov 2017, at 15:20, Beman Dawes via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> 
>> Peter Sommerlad, committee member and C++Now presenter who often proposes
>> additions to fill in  holes in the standard library, asked me:
>> 
>> Are you aware of anybody who tried to provide a boost::operators style of
>> automatically providing additional operators with a single base class that
>> through SFINAE injects all possible operators based on the ones defined in
>> the template parameter? This won't give you the control of the current
>> boost::operators, but would be much easier to teach.
> 
> I'm the current maintainer of Boost.Operators and I heard about anyone working on that.

Above sentence is missing a "haven't": I haven't heard of anyone working on that.