Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?
From: Gevorg Voskanyan (gevbsd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-15 06:27:35

Next message: Gavin Lambert: "Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?"
Previous message: Phil Bouchard: "[boost] [Root Pointer] Deterministic C++ memory manager (update)"
In reply to: Gavin Lambert: "Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?"
Next in thread: Gavin Lambert: "Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?"
Reply: Gavin Lambert: "Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?"

On 11/15/17 03:04, Gavin Lambert via Boost wrote:

> Given that NRVO is mandatory now, <snip>

It is? Since when? AFAIK C++17 makes RVO mandatory, but not NRVO.

Thanks,
Gevorg

Next message: Gavin Lambert: "Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?"
Previous message: Phil Bouchard: "[boost] [Root Pointer] Deterministic C++ memory manager (update)"
In reply to: Gavin Lambert: "Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?"
Next in thread: Gavin Lambert: "Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?"
Reply: Gavin Lambert: "Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk