Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?
From: Seth (bugs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-15 21:05:26

Next message: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] [contract] _NOEXCEPT errors in <ostream> for Clang 5.0 C++1z on Teeks Linux"
Previous message: degski: "Re: [boost] bjam boost build on windows - changing the path strategy (stage)"
In reply to: Richard Hodges: "Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?"
Next in thread: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?"

On 13-11-17 16:05, Richard Hodges via Boost wrote:
> of course I mean:

I'm pretty sure you made a mistake

Next message: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] [contract] _NOEXCEPT errors in <ostream> for Clang 5.0 C++1z on Teeks Linux"
Previous message: degski: "Re: [boost] bjam boost build on windows - changing the path strategy (stage)"
In reply to: Richard Hodges: "Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?"
Next in thread: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [operators] A modern SFINAE-based version of boost::operators?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk