Subject: Re: [boost] [gil][test] HOWTO set up the Boost testing process for projects with extra prerequisites ?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-17 17:30:42
On 11/17/2017 10:10 AM, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:
> On 17.11.2017 11:59, Rene Rivera via Boost wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Stefan Seefeld via Boost <
>> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Or have I misunderstood what you are proposing ?
>> ^^ That..
> OK, much better. But that doesn't answer the original question: How does
> a tester need to set up his system (and configure the build) for the GIL
> IO tests to work ?
> In either case does he
> a) need to install additional libraries
> b) add instructions (no matter whether it's a `-s...` command line
> option or an entry in the `user-config.jam` file) to locate them.
Right. We should probably have a list
of additional dependencies here:
> So with our current process we need to make all testers aware of that,
> or else the GIL tests will fail. (And no, I don't consider testing with
> in-process-built-prereq libs an option, as that doesn't represent the
> world that our users live in).
Building the prerequisite libraries is not
really any different, as it just moves the
problem to finding the sources.
> It's this existing practice that leads to a lot of noise in the test
> matrix (at least for the Boost.Python tests), as there are a ton of test
> runs that simply aren't set up correctly, and thus making it hard to
> identifying which of the many test failures are significant and should
> be acted upon by developers, rather than ignored.
The method I described won't generate as much noise,
as the tests are skipped instead of failing if the
library can't be found.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk