Subject: Re: [boost] Adding polymorphic_value to boost
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-20 19:34:19
Jonathan Coe wrote:
> Zac is correct. LEWG requested that const propagation was added to X and
> that it ceased to be pointer-like. I agree with their direction.
Const propagation is correct for cloning pointer.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk