Re: [boost] [release] 1.66.0 post-beta merges

Subject: Re: [boost] [release] 1.66.0 post-beta merges
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-26 09:46:03

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Daniel James via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'd go for 2 as it doesn't change the data model, but isn't this up to
> Chris Kohlhoff?

Yes it is ultimately up to Chris. My goal was to provide a few
different solutions as food for thought.

Thanks