Subject: Re: [boost] BOOST_PRAGMA_MESSAGE?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-12-04 00:51:08
Edward Diener wrote:
> So your original post was a question as to what library the macro should
> be added ? I vote for core.
I decided to propose it for Config, since it would be useful there as well,
as Config itself needs to emit messages via the preprocessor.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk