Re: [boost] Policy for breaking changes

Subject: Re: [boost] Policy for breaking changes
From: Richard Hodges (hodges.r_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-12-05 16:11:00

Degski wrote:
> The best thing would indeed be to stick to c++98 and be done with it...
All
> this new stuff (what *are* they thinking?), it's a pita and you actually
> have to try and master it (and that takes effort), so bullocks...

Bah! Who needs these newfangled automated weaving looms anyway?

:)

On 4 December 2017 at 23:19, degski via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 4 December 2017 at 15:44, Boris Schäling via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]
> > wrote:
>
> > I would prefer upgrading though without breaking code - possible now
> > thanks to Boost.Coroutine2).
> >
>
> The best thing would indeed be to stick to c++98 and be done with it... All
> this new stuff (what *are* they thinking?), it's a pita and you actually
> have to try and master it (and that takes effort), so bullocks...
>
> degski
> --
> "*Ihre sogenannte Religion wirkt bloß wie ein Opiat reizend, betäubend,
> Schmerzen aus Schwäche stillend.*" - Novalis 1798
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/
> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>