Subject: Re: [boost] [chrono][timer][release] Non-inline functions in inlined headers
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-12-13 23:51:51
On 13 December 2017 at 23:43, Gavin Lambert via Boost
> On 13/12/2017 23:24, Daniel James wrote:
>> I haven't got the binaries installed yet, so I haven't reproduced it,
>> but I think it's caused because timer now includes the chrono headers
>> using BOOST_CHRONO_HEADER_ONLY, and in the chrono inlined headers not
>> all functions are BOOST_CHRONO_INLINE. It looks like this problem was
>> always in chrono, but BOOST_CHRONO_HEADER_ONLY was widely used enough
>> for it to be detected.
> I'm having trouble parsing this. I think you're missing some negations
Should have been "wasn't widely used".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk