Subject: Re: [boost] [hash] Extract module from functional + std::hash_combine
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-12-19 17:01:06
Daniel James wrote:
> > The alternatives proposed by Howard Hinnant and by Google are better.
> IIUC the Josuttis paper is intended as a stop-gap that won't get in the
> way of a better proposal.
But it does get in the way, because the Google proposal has hash_combine
with different semantics.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk