|
Boost :
|
- Next message: James E. King, III: "Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one"
- Previous message: James E. King, III: "Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one"
- In reply to: James E. King, III: "Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one"
- Next in thread: James E. King, III: "Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one"
- Reply: James E. King, III: "Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one"
- Reply: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one"
James E. King, III wrote:
> 1. Craft a version 0 output stream manually or with the help of
> serialization code directly in the test, then read it in.
This looks perfectly sensible to me. Is there a problem with it?
- Next message: James E. King, III: "Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one"
- Previous message: James E. King, III: "Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one"
- In reply to: James E. King, III: "Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one"
- Next in thread: James E. King, III: "Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one"
- Reply: James E. King, III: "Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one"
- Reply: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk