Subject: Re: [boost] Candidate for 1.66.1, if there is one
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-12-24 18:33:16
On 12/24/17 9:07 AM, Seth via Boost wrote:
> On 24-12-17 18:04, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
>> This leads me to wonder if serialization is compatible across
>> platforms and if it is *supposed *to be compatible across platforms.
>> Is this a bug?? Shouldn't binary serialization be the same size on
>> every platform, assuming platform-specific types are not used?
> That's documented
> Anyways, there's EOS Portable Archive https://epa.codeplex.com/
This is a well done package which I believe was inspired by the portable
binary archive example in the serialization library. I made efforts
toward integrating this into the current serialization package. But it
wasn't a trivial fit so I had to set it aside... for now.
But I'm convinced that the serialization library needs a couple of
a) portable_binary_archive equivalent to EOS above
b) JSON archive
I've shied away from promoting portable_binary_archive to "official
status" as the main issue was dealing with floating point in a portable
way. This is a lot trickier than first meets the eye. But fortunately
or unfortunately, I've found myself getting involved with this at a low
level so I might make moves in this direction.
Lately, I've received more PRS form interested parties. This has
inspired me to invest a little more effort in evolving the library
relevant at least until the standards committee were to design and
implement their official version.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk